Furthermore I'd like to present two innovative solution approaches for technically and economically more efficient energy storage:

The target group of this solution are people living in an area of lower residential density but high potential for photovoltaics (e.g. residential areas consisting out of single-family homes) and commuting either directly into an urban area or to a park-&-ride facility. In such a situation, conventional electric cars with permanently installed batteries can hardly contribute to the relief of local power grids by reverse charging because around noon, when there is the maximum electricity generation by photovoltaics, these cars are not at home next to the photovoltaic system, but in a city or on a park-&-ride facility. Compared to other ways of reversed charging, leaving a part of the battery capacity at home has the advantage of avoiding additional contractual relationships between the car owner and different electricity suppliers buying and selling electricity at different time and locations. Instead, self-consumption is optimized and feed-in to the power grid is flattened.




Uneconomic temporal utilisation characteristics can concern not only electricity grids: If most of photovoltaic surplus generation would be used for production of e-fuels and synthetic methane, these energy conversion plants would also have very few full-load hours per year. It would be necessary to dimension these plants for the electricity surplus of summer noon peaks, but even in summer, most hours of the day they would by far not be fully utilized. This would heavily affect the profitability of these plants, which are still just in a phase of development and require expensive, rare materials like platinum or palladium for electrodes and catalytic surfaces. The demand for these plants and materials can be significantly reduced if synthetic methane and other synthetic hydrocarbons are produced only to the extent required in the chemical sector, for navigation and for aviation and if photovoltaic electricity generation is additionally buffered by decentralized storage for some hours and by big Carnot batteries for months:


This new use case for battery swapping systems isn't contradictory to the previously promoted use cases of batter swapping services, they can be well combined:



A plant of relatively similar characteristics except size and storage duration has been examined within the "High-T-Stor" project by the Universities of Applied Sciences Mittelhessen. The heat storage unit of this project is nearly a cube of about 2,4 m side length and consists out of ceramic bricks which can be heated up to 1200 °C, the insulation layer is about 60 cm. This storage looses roughly 5% of the stored heat per day. For reconversion of heat into electricity, a gas turbine cycle with external heating is applied: Air is blown through the heat storage and the heat from that air is transferred to the compressed air of the gas turbine cycle by a heat exchanger. Introducing compressed air or steam directly into the heat storage wouldn't be manageable from a process engineering point of view. Waste heat of this gar turbine cycle is used for district heating.

Combined cycle gas power plants can achieve more than 60% electrical efficiency without district heating. A maximum utilization of the burned fuel is possible when using waste heat for district heating with 54% electrical efficiency and 31% of the energy input used district heating, leading to a total loss of only 15%. In case of a combined cycle process based on a heat exchanger powered by heat storage, the expected electrical efficiency is lower because the temperature of the storage is lower than that of a gas burner. An estimation according to the Carnot theorem results in an electric efficiency of the heat storage powered combined cycle of about 35%. In case of an unchanged total efficiency of 85%, the share of heat from the storage that is converted into useful heat for district heating is about 50%.
Some detailed aspects at the end
Why don't you mention biomass?
Why don't you mention hydrogen?
Hydrogen that isn't consumed or processed to synthetic hydrocarbons shortly after its production must be stored intermediately. Storing hydrogen requires much more effort for liquefaction or extreme compression than storing methane or liquid hydrocarbons. Furthermore, cogeneration plants and pipelines need technical adaptations in order to work with hydrogen, whereas synthetic methane can be processed by the same plants and pipelines as fossil natural gas.
Why to you consider the heat losses from electrolysis and production of synthetic hydrocarbons as useless waste heat?
Heat losses from electrolysis inevitable occur exactly at the time of reliable energy overflow, during summer. If hydrogen isn't stored intermediately, the same applies for hydrocarbon synthesis. Despite there is some use for low-temperature heat during summer as well (e.g. water heating or industrial drying processes), there isn't really need for the use of further waste heat as solarthermic heat (thermal solar collectors or hybrid collectors) or waste heat from cooling and air condition processes are easily available.
What about using conventional electric cars as buffer batteries on park-&-ride facilities with photovoltaic roofs?
That would be possible, but anyways these cars wouldn't contribute to the relief of local power grids in residential areas with many small rooftop photovoltaic systems. Larger, more centralized photovoltaic systems as e.g. on park-&-ride facilities can be more easily connected to the medium or high voltage grid or directly to the catenary or third rail of the respective railway or subway. Furthermore it would require the commuters to connect and disconnect their cars to a charging station on the park-&-ride facility every day and clearing about consumed, stored and resold electricity becomes more complicated.
Would it be possible to import e-Fuels and synthetic methane from equatorial desert states?
From a technical point of view yes, but in practice nearly all suitable countries are authoritarian or fragile states. There is no reliable instrument to make such developments happen there and it would by geopolitically anything but reasonable to make us again dependent on such energy suppliers.
Aren't there any alternatives to such high effort for energy storage technology?
Yes, from a technical and energy-economical point of view in particular the following solutions could diminish the demand for energy storage:
All these measures are desirable as they can reduce the necessary storage capacity but I doubt they could make energy storage obsolete. As outlined before, current tendencies in the energy sector and politics rather suggest that the demand for energy storage will be higher than assumed.
References and assumptions in a separate document